visual studio advanced installer vs msdn

The good news (announced at the same Desktop Bridge session) is that the format is now supported by both Advanced installer and Installshield.

MSI Packagers is that although things have gone very quiet on Windows Phone and the Windows Store hasn’t taken off yet we are still going to have to take notice of the. So it appears Andrew is still at work and APPX is still considered to have advantages over the. MSI has been excluded: See “ Installing Windows Server Apps on Nano Server“.

This news was fairly low key and I didn’t find the benefit arguments given too compelling for a corporate environment (Live tiles, Notifications, Cortana Integration, Re-installation of your apps after a broken PC), but there are productivity and admin reduction advantages to self-service app-stores, particularly for apps where licensing is not an issue and admin rights are not required.įor Nano Server, the news is that. APPX model (but not making them UWP Apps). This is about making it easy/easier to move/shoehorn existing apps on to the. There has been recent news about Desktop Bridge and the Desktop App Converter. In May we heard about Appinstaller (with Windows 10 Anniversary Update) allowing you to install an. Come build 2016, Windows Phone was missing and many people now regard it as dead. We’re investing all of our efforts into making AppX the ultimate installer across the Windows ecosystem.” At build 2015 however Windows Phone was still being discussed along with “Continuum” (the idea that your phone can be a PC in your pocket) and UWP Apps (which only come in APPX format) were important for Windows Phone. MSI isn’t going to go away, but we want you to move to APPX. At Build 2015 in March, Andrew Clinick said: “APPX is now our deployment model.

Visual studio advanced installer vs msdn